Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12666/261
Title: Lithium-rotation connection in the newly discovered young stellar stream Psc-Eri (Meingast 1) (Corrigendum)
Authors: Arrancibia Silva, J.
Bouvier, J.
Bayo, A.
Galli, P. A. B.
Brandner, W.
Bouy, H.
Barrado, D.
Keywords: Stars: low mass;Stars: pre main sequence;Stars: abundances;Open clusters and associations: individual: Psc-Eri;Stars: rotation;Errata-addenda
Issue Date: 7-Aug-2020
Publisher: EDP Sciences
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937137e
Published version: https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2020/08/aa37137e-19/aa37137e-19.html
Citation: Astronomy and Astrophysics 640: C2(2020)
Abstract: Context. As a fragile element, lithium is a sensitive probe of physical processes occurring in stellar interiors. Aims. We aim to investigate the relationship between lithium abundance and rotation rate in low-mass members of the newly discovered 125 Myr-old Psc–Eri stellar stream. Methods. We obtained high-resolution optical spectra and measured the equivalent width of the 607.8 nm LiI line for 40 members of the Psc–Eri stream, whose rotational periods have been previously derived. Results. We show that a tight correlation exists between the lithium content and rotation rate among the late-G to early-K-type stars of the Psc–Eri stream. Fast rotators are systematically Li rich, while slow rotators are Li depleted. This trend mimics that previously reported for the similar age Pleiades cluster. Conclusions. The lithium-rotation connection thus seems to be universal over a restricted effective temperature range for low-mass stars at or close to the zero-age main sequence, and does not depend on environmental conditions.
Description: In the original paper (Arancibia-Silva et al. 2020), there was a typographic error in Table 1, where column Gbp-Grp was duplicated from column MG and the actual values referring to the quantity were not displayed. However, this has no impact on the analysis, results, or discussion in the paper since the correct values were used in the analysis (see, for example, Fig. 1 of Arancibia-Silva et al. 2020). The complete table with the correct values is presented in this erratum in Table 1.
Erratum for: A&A 635, L3 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937137
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12666/261
E-ISSN: 1432-0746
ISSN: 0004-6361
Appears in Collections:(CAB) Artículos



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons