Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12666/473
Title: | Asymmetric Magnetic Anomalies Over Young Impact Craters on Mercury |
Authors: | Galluzzi, V. Oliveira, J. S. Wright, Jack Rothery, D. A. Hood, L. L. |
Keywords: | Magnetic Anomalies;Craters;Mercury |
Issue Date: | 1-Feb-2021 |
Publisher: | AGU |
DOI: | 10.1029/2020GL091767 |
Published version: | https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020GL091767 |
Citation: | Geophysical Research Letters 48(5): e2020GL091767(2021) |
Abstract: | Mercury's crustal magnetic field map includes anomalies that are related to impact craters. Mercury's surface has a low iron abundance, but it is likely that some impactors brought magnetic carriers able to register the planet's magnetic field that was present during impact. Anomalies associated with the relatively young Rustaveli and Stieglitz craters are asymmetric with respect to the crater center. We analyze the location of the magnetic anomalies and the impact crater morphologies to understand whether there is any correlation. We investigate the geological framework of these two craters to constrain the overall impact dynamics. In both cases, magnetic anomalies correlate well with the location of impact melt and the inferred impact direction. Both impact angles were probably 40°–45°, with preferential distribution of the melt downrange. Inversion dipoles suggest that the impact melt located downrange encompasses some magnetized material, which is hence likely responsible for the detected magnetic anomalies. We observe strong crustal magnetic field imprints near two recent craters on Mercury. We know that the crust of rocky planets may include magnetic elements like iron that can record the local magnetic field under certain circumstances. However, Mercury's crust is known to be remarkably poor in iron. In this study, we want to find out whether these observed magnetic imprints near craters happened by chance or if it can be explained by the impactors bringing iron to Mercury's surface. We make a joint-study of two different scientific areas: Geology and geophysics. Via the geological study, we found an uneven distribution of “impact melt,” which is material flung out of the crater in molten form during the impact that made the crater. Via the geophysical study, we found evidence that magnetized material correlates with the position of those pools that are found in the downrange direction of the impact. In conclusion, this study supports the hypothesis that iron was brought on Mercury by the impactors. |
Description: | Crustal magnetic field data is available through Hood et al. (2018). A data set containing the maps that support the findings of this paper can be found in the National Institute of Astrophysics (INAF) repository at https://doi.org/10.20371/INAF/DS/2021_00001. Also supporting information: Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12666/473 |
E-ISSN: | 1944-8007 |
ISSN: | 0094-8276 |
Appears in Collections: | (Espacio) Artículos |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
acceso-restringido.pdf | 221,73 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.